What five major changes will the relationship between Wall Street and BTC experience in 2025?

Author: Ledn CEO Mauricio Di Bartolomeo, CoinDesk; Translated by: Bai Shui, Jinse Caijing

When Michael Saylor announced in August 2020 that MicroStrategy would convert $250 million of its financial reserves into Bitcoin, Wall Street analysts considered it a reckless gamble. Saylor claimed at the time that Bitcoin was "superior to cash," which raised skepticism in traditional banking circles.

However, those banks that once mocked the adoption of Bitcoin by businesses are now rushing to participate in Bitcoin-backed loans, as they compete to leverage the superior characteristics of Bitcoin as institutional-grade collateral and the thriving product-market fit.

Traditional collateral (such as real estate) requires manual assessment, subjective evaluations, and complex legal frameworks (which vary by jurisdiction). In contrast, Bitcoin offers instant verification of collateral support through public blockchain data, 24/7 real-time settlement and clearing capabilities, uniform quality regardless of geographic location or counterparties, and the ability to programmatically enforce loan terms.

When borrowers realize they can instantly verify and possibly liquidate Bitcoin collateral at 3 AM on a Sunday—while real estate is waiting for manual assessments, subjective valuations, and potential evictions—there will be no turning back.

1. Traditional banking succumbs to Bitcoin.

MicroStrategy (MSTR)'s approach has fundamentally changed the way publicly traded companies view Bitcoin as a financial asset. Rather than simply holding Bitcoin, the company pioneered a financial model that used the open market to expand its cryptocurrency position – issuing convertible notes and issuing shares in the market to fund the purchase of Bitcoin. This strategy allows MicroStrategy to leverage the same financial engineering that makes traditional banks strong, but with Bitcoin as the underlying asset, rather than traditional financial instruments and real estate, allowing MicroStrategy to significantly outperform spot Bitcoin ETFs.

Therefore, one of my predictions for 2025 is that MSTR will announce a 10-for-1 stock split to further expand its market share, as this will allow more investors to purchase stocks and options contracts. MicroStrategy's actions demonstrate how deeply Bitcoin has penetrated traditional corporate financing.

I also believe that as long-term holders and new investors seek to gain more returns from their positions, financial services built around Bitcoin will become highly popular. We expect the Bitcoin mortgage and revenue-generating products for global Bitcoin holders to grow rapidly.

Moreover, there is a nearly poetic answer to why Bitcoin-backed loans have become so popular—they are a true representation of financial inclusion, with entrepreneurs in Medellín facing the same collateral requirements and interest rates as those in Madrid. Every person's Bitcoin has the same properties, verification standards, and settlement processes. This standardization eliminates the arbitrary risk premiums historically imposed on borrowers in emerging markets.

For decades, traditional banks have been promoting "global influence" while maintaining vastly different lending standards in different regions. Now, Bitcoin-backed loans have exposed the inherent inefficiency of this legacy: the remnants of an outdated financial system.

2. With the free flow of capital, borders disappear.

Countries are entering a new era of Bitcoin business and capital competition. Therefore, we expect to see new tax incentives specifically targeting Bitcoin investors and businesses by 2025. These incentives will be implemented alongside a fast-track visa program for cryptocurrency entrepreneurs and a regulatory framework designed to attract Bitcoin companies.

Historically, countries have vied for manufacturing bases or regional headquarters. They are now competing for Bitcoin mining operations, trading venues, and custody infrastructure.

El Salvador's position as a Bitcoin treasury represents an early experiment in national Bitcoin reserves. Although experimental, their actions and the recent proposal for a Bitcoin strategic reserve in the United States have forced traditional financial centers to confront the role of Bitcoin in sovereign finance.

Other countries will study and attempt to replicate these frameworks, preparing their own initiatives to attract capital flows denominated in Bitcoin.

3. Open the door for banking participants.

In the debt market, necessity drives innovation. Public companies are now frequently using the bond market and convertible notes to fund Bitcoin-related transactions. This practice has transformed Bitcoin from a speculative asset into a cornerstone of corporate financial management.

Marathon Digital Holdings and Semler Scientific, among others, have successfully followed in the footsteps of MicroStrategy and have reaped the rewards of the market. This is the most significant signal for financial managers and CEOs. Bitcoin is now catching their attention.

At the same time, the Bitcoin lending market has made significant progress over the past two years. Serious institutional lenders now require appropriate collateral segregation, transparent custody arrangements, and conservative loan-to-value ratios. The standardization of these risk management practices has precisely attracted previously reserved institutional capital.

Regulation has become clearer. More banks should be allowed to participate in Bitcoin financial products – this will benefit consumers the most, as new capital and competition will drive down interest rates and make Bitcoin-backed loans more attractive.

4. The merger of Bitcoin and cryptocurrency intensifies.

With the regulatory clarification of the SAB 121 resolution involving cryptocurrency custody and other guidance, banks will face a critical choice: to establish or acquire a way to enter the growing Bitcoin and lending market. Therefore, we anticipate that at least one bank among the top 20 in the U.S. will acquire a cryptocurrency business next year.

Banks want to act quickly, the development timeline for cryptocurrency infrastructure has surpassed the competitive window, and established companies are already processing billions of transactions per month through tested systems.

These operational platforms represent years of specialized development that banks cannot quickly replicate. The acquisition premium has narrowed compared to the opportunity cost of delayed market entry.

The combination of operational maturity, regulatory clarity, and strategic necessity creates natural conditions for the banking industry to acquire cryptocurrency capabilities.

5. Public market validation of Bitcoin infrastructure.

The cryptocurrency industry is expected to see a breakthrough year in the public market. We anticipate at least one highly anticipated cryptocurrency initial public offering in the U.S. with a valuation exceeding $10 billion. Major digital asset companies have established a complex layer of institutional services, with their revenue streams now comparable to those of traditional banks, handling billions of dollars in daily transactions, managing a substantial amount of custody business through stringent compliance frameworks, and generating stable fee income from regulated activities.

Therefore, the next chapter of finance will not be written by those who resist this change, but by those who recognize that their survival depends on embracing change.