Recently, Wall Street has once again sparked a discussion about the future of Crypto Assets. Some claim that Ether is about to surpass Bitcoin and become the new dominant force in the Crypto Assets market. This rhetoric is not new; it resurfaces every few years as if it is a cyclical topic.

For such statements, we need to keep a clear mind and analyze rationally. Although such remarks sound exciting and seem to imply opportunities for quick wealth, we should not be misled by the superficial noise.

As a long-term holder of Bitcoin, I also have a positive attitude towards the development of Ethereum. In fact, this year the increase in Ethereum may indeed exceed that of Bitcoin. However, this does not mean that Ethereum will replace Bitcoin's position.

The claim that Ethereum will "surpass" or "replace" Bitcoin lacks basic logical support. This viewpoint ignores Bitcoin's unique position and value as the first and most mature crypto asset. Bitcoin and Ethereum have essential differences in design philosophy and application scenarios, making it difficult to simply describe their relationship as one of "replacement".

Investors should understand that the development of the crypto assets market is not a zero-sum game. Bitcoin and Ethereum can both play to their strengths in their respective fields, jointly promoting the growth of the entire blockchain ecosystem. Over-focusing on short-term price fluctuations or believing unverified predictions can lead to biases in investment decisions.

When investing in Crypto Assets, we should focus on long-term value, deeply understand the technical foundations and application prospects of each project, rather than being influenced by short-term market noise. Whether it's Bitcoin or Ethereum, each has its unique value proposition and development path. Wise investors should make choices based on their own investment goals and risk preferences, rather than blindly following market rumors.