As a representative token in the field of Real World Assets (RWA), OM has recently experienced dramatic market fluctuations. From a peak market value of tens of billions of dollars to a single-day crash of 90%, and then to the signal of technical upgrades and ecological cooperation, the dynamics of the OM token not only affect investors’ nerves, but also reflect the potential risks and long-term value of the RWA track.
On April 13, 2025, the price of OM token plummeted from $6.3 to $0.37 during the early hours in Asia, with a drop of over 90%, causing a market capitalization loss of about $5 billion. This event was referred to by some investors as the ‘most severe crash since the LUNA crisis,’ sparking widespread doubts in the market about the liquidity and governance transparency of RWA projects.
According to on-chain data analysis, before the plunge, 17 wallets transferred 43.6 million OM (approximately 227 million US dollars) to exchanges, suspected to be related to the investment party Laser Digital. Although the MANTRA team denies involvement in the sell-off, some community opinions point out that the high concentration of tokens and insufficient exchange liquidity are the main causes of the crash, especially the large-scale liquidation during low liquidity periods that amplified selling pressure.
Faced with the collapse, MANTRA blames the “reckless forced liquidation” of centralized exchanges (CEX), emphasizing that the token economic model has not changed, and the team tokens are still in a locked state.
Behind the controversy, MANTRA’s governance model is being questioned. The Hong Kong court had previously required it to disclose financial records to investigate allegations of misappropriation of funds. Although the project team announced a buyback and burn plan after the collapse, the specific details are missing, and market confidence is slowly recovering.
OM’s turmoil highlights the dual nature of the RWA project:
The road to OM’s recovery depends on three key factors:
The ups and downs of OM tokens are not only a microcosm of the early development stage of the RWA track but also provide investors with an important warning: when embracing the vision of blockchain empowering real assets, it is necessary to carefully assess liquidity risks, project governance, and market cycles. With technological iterations and regulatory frameworks improving, whether OM can truly become a benchmark for RWA infrastructure still needs time to verify.